2024 Efe v. ashcroft

Efe v. ashcroft

Author: jbfr

August undefined, 2024

WebMorton Sklar (argued), World Organization Against Torture USA, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Patrick P. Shen (argued), U.S. Dept. of Justice, Immigration Litigation ... WebKenneth Efe is a Nigerian citizen who attempted entry into the United States in January 1998. His testimony regarding the circumstances that brought him to the U.S. changed …

EDUARD v. ASHCROFT (2004) FindLaw

WebJun 7, 2004 · In addition, Thuri requested withholding of removal under § 241 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3)(A), which is available on similar grounds but requires a more stringent showing that the alien will probably be persecuted if removed to a certain country, see Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906 (5th Cir.2002). Finally, Thuri applied for relief ... WebEfe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899 (5th Cir. 2002); Barreto-Claro v. United States Attorney Gen., 275 F.3d 1334 (11th Cir. 2001). These cases reaffirm the importance, as required by regulation, of the applicant's receiving an opportunity to explain any discrepancies in the testimony before a finding of frivolousness — permanently barring ... bmw hillington parts

EFE v. ASHCROFT 293 F.3d 899 5th Cir. - Casemine

WebPorównanie statystyk zawodników: Josh Muligan vs Efe Ambrose. Bramki, mecze, asysty, strzały i wiele innych danych z całej kariery WebMar 12, 2010 · In Efe v. Ashcroft, the criminal act of killing a police officer at a rally outweighed the alien's political motive, even where the police were allegedly violent toward the protestors. 293 F.3d 899, 905-06 (5th Cir. 2002). WebMansour v. INS, 230 F.3d 902, 905 (7th Cir. 2000); Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 903 (5th Cir. 2002) ("We give great deference to an immigration judge's decisions regarding an alien's credibility."). We require that an adverse credibility finding merely be supported by "specific, cogent reasons" that "bear a legitimate nexus to the finding ... click and peugeot

Ashcroft v. ACLU Electronic Frontier Foundation

FARAH v. ASHCROFT (2003) FindLaw

WebNov 22, 2006 · See, e.g., Zhang v. Gonzales, 432 F.3d at 344; Faddoul, 37 F.3d at 188; see also Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906 (5th Cir.2002) (writing that an applicant for withholding of removal must show "'it is more likely than not' that his life or freedom would be threatened by persecution" (quoting 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(b)(1))). Although the standard ... WebIn Efe, the Fifth Circuit recently affirmed an IJ's finding that the petitioner had knowingly filed a frivolous asylum application with intentionally false statements. See Efe, 293 F.3d at … bmw hindhead baronsWebNo. 15-60761 3 380 F.3d 788, 79293— (5th Cir. 2004), to hold that the “nuclear family” does not constitute a cognizable “social group.” bmw hilversum

"WebApr 3, 2024 · Ashcroft , 357 F.3d 169, 180 (2d Cir. 2004), Avelar-Oliva argues the BIA and IJ erred by failing to specifically evaluate the reliability of her CFI under those factors before considering it in rendering an adverse credibility determination. " - Efe v. ashcroft

Efe v. ashcroft

WebJun 20, 2002 · Kenneth EFE, Petitioner, v. John D. ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. No. 01-60314. Decided: June 20, 2002 Before STEWART … WebJohn D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. Kenneth Efe, Petitioner, v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent, …

Did you know?

WebJun 20, 2002 · The investigator failed to find: information on Efe or his family in state, local, or police records in Owena Village, Benin, Nigeria; a primary school matching the one … WebApr 9, 2003 · In Efe, the Fifth Circuit recently affirmed an IJ's finding that the petitioner had knowingly filed a frivolous asylum application with intentionally false statements. See …

WebSee Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir. 2003). This court reviews the final decision of the BIA and will only consider the decision of the Immigration J udge where it influenced th e decision of the BIA. See Zhu v. Gonzales, … WebDepartment of Justice Washington, D.C. 205300001- SupremeCtBriefs @usdoj.gov (202) 514-2217

WebJun 20, 2002 · Kenneth EFE, Petitioner, v. John D. ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. No. 01-60314. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. … WebJun 20, 2002 · Efe v. Ashcroft, No. 01-60314. DocumentCited authorities 28Cited in 360Precedent MapRelated Vincent 293 F.3d 899 Kenneth EFE, Petitioner, v. John D. ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. No. 01-60314. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 20, 2002. Page 900

WebSep 12, 2024 · See Wang v. Ashcroft, 260 F.3d 448, 452-53 (5th Cir. 2001) (“An alien fails to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to an issue when the issue is not … bmw hilton head used carsWebJun 7, 2004 · Ashcroft, 303 F.3d 341, 350-51 (5th Cir. 2002). In arguing to the contrary, Thuri cites the Ninth Circuit's decision in Hernandez-Montiel v. INS, 225 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2000). click and pedal photographyWebApr 21, 2004 · Text. Citations (29) Cited By (6) United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT … click and pawl fly reels for saleWebJun 20, 2002 · 293 F.3d 899. Kenneth EFE, Petitioner, v. John D. ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. No. 01-60314. United States Court of … bmw hiltonWebMay 6, 2004 · See Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 905-06 (5th Cir. 2002) (demonstrator's attack and killing of police officer at a political rally was disproportionate to his political objectives). Chay-Velasquez did not carry his burden to prove that the serious nonpolitical crime preclusion should not apply to his case. bmw hippy decorWebPetitioners argue that, as a matter of law, CAT claims are raised every time an applicant files for asylum or withholding of removal under INA § 241 (b) (3) (B). We do not agree. A claim under the CAT is a separate claim from withholding of removal under the INA. Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906-07 (5th Cir. 2002). bm whipple blue hc-152WebApr 9, 2003 · Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899 (5th Cir.2002); Barreto-Claro v. United States Attorney Gen., 275 F.3d 1334 (11th Cir.2001). These cases reaffirm the importance, as required by regulation, of the applicant's receiving an opportunity to explain any discrepancies in the testimony before a finding of frivolousness — permanently barring … click and play 360