Cit vs. godavari saraf
WebJul 4, 2016 · Such a High Court being a non-jurisdictional High Court does not alter the position as laid down by Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the matter of CIT vs. Godavari Devi Saraf ([1978) 113 ITR 589 (Bom)] and as analysed by a coordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of ACIT Vs Aurangabad Holiday Resorts Pvt Ltd [(2009) 118 ITD 1 (Pune)]. WebMar 9, 2012 · In an old judgement but useful Judgment Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent …
Cit vs. godavari saraf
Did you know?
WebSep 11, 2009 · CIT(A) dismissed, the appeal of assessee by holding that full and true disclosure of all material facts was not done by the assessee during the original assessment proceedings he held the re-assessment proceedings to be valid. Coming to the first argument of the assessee we find that the notice for reopening the assessment u/s 147 … WebMar 8, 2012 · In an old judgement but useful Judgment Bombay High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent High Court, which is binding on a Tribunal in the relevant State, it has to proceed on the footing that the law declared by the High Court, though of another State, is the fina...
WebWe are, therefore, bound by that decision in view of the principle laid down by the Bombay High Court in the case of CIT v. Smt. GodavarideviSaraf[1978] 113 ITR 589. As held by … WebIt has been held in following cases that the Tribunal is obliged to follow the decision of any High Court of other State where there is no contrary decision on that matter by any other High Court - (i) CIT vs. Smt Nirmala Bai K. Dareckar, 186 ITR 242 (Bom), (ii) CIT vs Smt. Godavari Saraf, 113 ITR 589 (Bom). In CIT vs. Maganlal Mohal Lal (HUF ...
WebCIT vs. Mangalal Mohanlal Panchal (HUF) 210 ITR 580 (Guj) CIT vs. Smt. Godavari Saraf 113 ITR 589 ... In the case of Mayavati vs. CIT the Hon'ble Delhi 44 ITA No.93/Ahd/2007 Asst. Year 1998-99 High Court the judgment in the case of Haryana Acrilyc Manufacturing Co. (supra) was explained as under :- "Mr. Salve learned senior counsel ...
WebApr 8, 2024 · (This judgement can be used and is applicable across the country. Decision of any High Court is binding on all subordinate authorities and Tribunals through out India …
WebAug 3, 2016 · (A) CIT Vs Godavari Power & Ispat Ltd (223 Taxman 234) (Chattisgarh HC) "30. The Steel-Division of the Assessee is a consumer. The CPP of...consideration before Chhattisgarh High Court in case of CIT v. Godawari Power & Ispat Ltd. [2014] 42 taxmann.com 551/223 Taxman 234, in which the Court held and observed as under... impact sports pickleball superiorhttp://www.in.kpmg.com/taxflashnews/KPMG-Flash-News-R-K-P-Company-2.pdf list to table onlineWebMar 8, 2012 · Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent High Court, which is binding on a Tribunal in the relevant State, it has to … impact sports superior co pickleballWebBombay High Court, in the case of CIT vs. Godavari Saraf reported in 119 ITR 539 held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent High Court, which is binding on a Tribunal in the relevant State, it has to proceed on the footing that the law declared by the High Court, though of another State, is the final law of the land ... impact sports tualatinWebThe CIT(A) ought not to have confirmed the same considering the fact that the contributions for the months April to May, 2024 were paid with marginal delay and contributions for Dec. 2024 to Feb.2024 were paid before the financial year ended on 31.3.2024 and contribution for March, 2024 was paid before the due date of filing of IT return u/s ... list to string autolispWebAug 2, 2016 · In an old judgement but useful Judgment Bombay High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent High Court, which is binding on a Tribunal in the relevant State, it has to proceed on the footing that the law declared by the High Court, though of another State, is the fina... impactsprayWebRecently, the Raipur Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) in the case of R K P Company1(the taxpayer) held that second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) of the … impact spray alert